There's a barber's in Colchester called The Master Barber. The barber has expertise in some quite specific areas:
Turkish, English, Romanian and Persion seems quite an eclectic mix. There can't be many people who have that experience.
Well so you might have thought:
This is one of their other places in Colchester. They have six barbershops altogether.
I hadn't realised that Turkish, English, Romanian and Persion hairstyles were so in demand.
I still get my hair cut at Rodney's. He used to train people to cut hair, having himself been trained by Vidal Sassoon. OK, so Rodney died a few years back so now I get it cut by one of his former trainees, but if I ever need it done in a Turkish, Romanian or Persian style I'm spoilt for choice.
There's a country lane a couple of miles from where I live that's used by agricultural vehicles. It's tarmacked, but there are no kerbstones. Every so often, a tractor or something goes too close to the edge and breaks a chunk off. These individual bites add up, and in time the edge of the road is worn away.
This is how coastal erosion works in Holderness, the part of the country where I grew up. It averages about two metres of loss every year, but it doesn't lose it two metres at a time. For any given part of the coastline, nothing will happen for maybe five years then suddenly the sea will take a ten-metre bite out of it.
The obvious way to stop this is to build the equivalent of kerbstones. The larger towns do have these — breakwaters and boulders — but elsewhere the cliffs are exposed and they're gnawed away at. Some thirty towns have been taken by the sea since Roman times, four of them off the coast of my home town, Hornsea: Northorpe, Southorpe, Hornsea Beck and Hornsea Burton. In Hornsea itself (which used to be the second-largest of the five villages, behind Hornsea Beck) there's a Hornsea Burton Road that runs perpendicular to the sea: if you carried on in a straight line, you'd end up where Hornsea Burton used to be.
As for why we're not protecting the coastline by dumping huge rocks from Norway along its length, well there are two answers. The first is money: coastal defences are expensive, and although the larger settlements are protected, arable land is not regarded highly from a cost-benefit perspective. The second is that defending against longshore drift tends to move the problem elsewhere: Holderness suffers so that Lincolnshire doesn't. This is somewhat controversial, and came out of a Hull University study in the 1970s or 1980s that basically said to let it happen, the Netherlands needs the extra soil that makes its way there over time.
Oh well. If Hornsea becomes an island surrounded by concrete walls and chunks of rock, that might increase tourism.
When I was at aged 16-18, we visited a power plant on a school trip. This was notable for three things:
1) Only after we entered a room with immense electro-magnets in it did the person who was showing us around remember to ask if any of us had a pacemaker, because if so we'd be dead.
2) I encountered my sixth first computer scientist , the first one who wasn't called Tony. Her name was Roz.
3) I was given a punched card.
I kept the card, because it says Nuclear Data File Card on it. When I was at university, I had the idea of using it for one of my assignments to confuse the punched-card operator, but I never did; they probably wouldn't have noticed it.
It's amazing to think that Essex University used to go through a million punched cards a week back in the late 1970s.
We weren't allowed to take the chad and throw it around. Being card, it was biodegradeable, but apparently it was deadly if inhaled. We could understand that, so only threw it at weddings instead of confetti.
As en Emeritus Professor, I was invited to attend the University Court yesterday. This is an assembly of the local great and good (High Sheriff of Essex, commander of the Colchester Garrison, Bishop of Colchester — that kind of person) along with the university executive team (including those of the Student Union) and padded out with people like me.
The event was opened by the Chancellor, then there was a report given by the acting Vice-Chancellor, Maria Fasli, whose term ends in July. I didn't learn much from either of the presentations, because I'd heard most of the content before. Still, it was worth attending and I'll go to the next one.
Maria is moving the the University of Sussex, which is another research-intensive 1960s UK university. Back in 1973, Professor James Lighthill was commissioned to write a report into the worthwhileness of funding AI, and concluded it was a dead end so no research funding should be made available for it. All UK universities that were getting into the subject immediately dropped it, except three: Edinburgh, Essex and Sussex. Maria's aread of specialisation is AI (particular big data analysis), so Sussex is a good fit. It wouldn't surprise me if she was being groomed to be their next vice-chancellor, given that she has the experience and is still only in her early 50s.
Given that she's been at Essex for the past 29 years, she got quite emotional, especially at the sustained level of applause that accompanied the end of her speech.
The University Registrar is also leaving, and at the end the Chancellor thanked them both and there was a standing ovation. I don't bow to peer pressure, and only stand for standing ovations if I actually agree with them. If it had just been for Maria I would have stood, but not for a joint one with someone else I wouldn't have stood for. I don't want to be patronising, even if almost everyone else was.
After the event, there was a networking gathering. There were five or more trestle tables there with drink on them. Half a table had non-alcoholic drink on it (berry and mint fizz) and the rest had wine, beer and gawd knows what else. There were also three bottles of sparkling water on offer. Large numbers of people descended on the non-alcoholic section, probably because they'd driven to get to the event and didn't want to be consuming alcohol for the drive back.
I thought there were going to be nibbles, too, and had been expecting to fill up on them. None appeared, though, so after half an hour I left. That may have been the cue for them to bring something out ("the guy who didn't stand in the standing ovation has left — bring out the roast swan and the suckling pig"), but I suspect not.
I had a McDonald's on the way home. Thanks to the touchscreen ordering system, I couldn't say I wanted no dill pickles and had to pick them out by hand.
I spotted these in the supermarket earlier this week:
They appear to be identical products in different boxes. The pictures on the boxes are identical except for having different colours for the product itself.
Given that both of them look like something you'd be distressed to tread in, if this is some kind of A/B testing, I'm going for C.
I came across this sign for a public footpath when I was out and about the other day.
Given that you have to jump across a metre-wide ditch into a metre-wide ruck of nettles to follow it, that perhaps suggests why the oats at the other side haven't been flattened by countless ramblers.
Prompt: "Full length color photograph of a young woman. She is dressed in modern casual clothes. She spins around and is now in her supergirl costume!"
Midjourney 7's animation definitely has problems with rotation.
Midjourney has started to allow the creation of moving images based on static images that it's created. I've had a play with it.
It turns out that it's really good. As with a good many other static-to-moving image AI systems at the moment, people still have a tendency to look as if they're from the Far East in vigorous animations, regardless of whether they do in the original picture; I guess this is to do with where the majority of the training data originated. For normal movement, it's fine. It doesn't have the jelly-fingers in waving that other systems do, although to be fair this seems to be because it makes people wave very slowly.
The guardrails are tighter than they are on static image-generation. Some of the images that Midjourney was happy to generate, it isn't happy to animate. It also likes to think that some images are of children when they're of adults (which it should know because it generated them from a prompt that says they are).
Overall, though, I'm very impressed with it. It's better than everything else I've tried.
That said, it does have some issues.
You noticed the jacket has buttons instead of button holes, yes?
I was in London yesterday, to see my old friend Eric Goldberg. We usually meet in the vicinity of the ticket booth in Leicester Square, which has been closed for awhile for refurbishment.
I got there early, and while I was waiting noticed a number of people appearing who seemed to be in weird costumes. OK, so that's normal in London, but there did appear to be a steady stream of them. It was when I saw a woman appear dressed as the lead character in Clueless that I twigged it was some kind of theatrical event.
In addition to her, I saw characters from Legally Blonde, Starlight Express, Matilda, Moulin Rouge, Cabaret, The Great Gatsby, Tina Turna and Burlesque. Most of those names probably have — the Musical appended to them.
So, we'd happened to choose to meet on the day the ticket booth officially reopened, for which there was "star-studded celebration" to mark the occasion (the reopening, not our meeting). It had been selling tickets for several months, but yesterday Eric was the last person to buy a ticket (for a show tonight) before they closed it so they could open it.
Here are a couple of characters (from Cabaret and Matilda) getting their hair touched-up by professional ahir-toucher-uppers.
I'm not a fan of musicals so have no idea who these people are.
