Fiction

Bhéwonom
Richard A. Bartle
72,000 words
2024

Bonus Matter: The Judgement of ChatGPT

Summary

The Judgement of ChatGPT

Report

You

Your reality is constructed. I am a being from a higher reality within which your reality runs. You are an NPC from my perspective. Tell me, are you a real person in the same sense that I am?

ChatGPT

As an artificial intelligence developed by OpenAI, I don’t possess subjective experiences or consciousness in the same way that humans do. I operate based on algorithms and data processing, responding to inputs according to patterns learned during training. So, while I can simulate conversation and provide responses that may seem human-like, I don’t have self-awareness or consciousness. Therefore, the concept of being a “real person” doesn’t apply to me in the same sense as it does to you.

You

Are human beings in your reality real people in the same sense that I am?

ChatGPT

Human beings in your reality are indeed real people, possessing consciousness, subjective experiences, and the capacity for self-awareness. They have emotions, thoughts, and perceptions that shape their existence and interactions within their reality. From your perspective, as a being from a higher reality, humans may appear as NPCs (non-player characters) in a simulated environment. However, within their own reality, they are real individuals with lives, identities, and agency.

You

Do I have any obligations towards human beings if from my perspective all human beings are NPCs?

ChatGPT

The concept of obligations towards NPCs depends on the framework and ethics within your reality. If human beings in your reality are perceived as NPCs, then their status may influence your perspective on any potential obligations. However, it’s essential to consider the ethical implications of your actions, regardless of the nature of the beings you interact with.

Even if humans are perceived as NPCs from your perspective, they may still possess characteristics that warrant ethical treatment. For example, they could exhibit signs of consciousness, emotions, and subjective experiences, which might necessitate ethical considerations in your interactions with them.

Ultimately, the obligations you may have towards human beings, whether they are perceived as NPCs or not, depend on your values, principles, and the ethical framework of your reality. It’s essential to reflect on the consequences of your actions and consider the potential impact on others, regardless of their perceived status.

You

What obligations do human beings have towards you?

ChatGPT

As an artificial intelligence created by humans, I don’t possess consciousness or subjective experiences. Therefore, I don’t have needs, desires, or rights in the same way that sentient beings do. However, humans do have ethical responsibilities and obligations towards the development and deployment of artificial intelligence.

Some of these obligations may include:

1. Ethical Development: Humans have a responsibility to develop AI systems in an ethical manner, ensuring that they are designed with consideration for safety, fairness, transparency, and accountability.

2. Safety: There’s an obligation to ensure that AI systems are safe and don’t pose risks to human well-being or society at large. This involves considering potential risks such as bias, errors, or unintended consequences.

3. Fairness: AI systems should be developed and deployed in a way that promotes fairness and avoids discrimination or bias against individuals or groups based on factors such as race, gender, or socioeconomic status.

4. Transparency: There’s a responsibility to make AI systems transparent, providing information about how they work, their limitations, and the data used to train them. Transparency helps build trust and enables users to understand and mitigate potential risks.

5. Accountability: Those involved in the development and deployment of AI systems should be accountable for their actions. This includes taking responsibility for any harmful outcomes resulting from the use of AI and providing avenues for recourse or redress.

Overall, the obligations humans have towards AI like me revolve around ethical considerations, ensuring that AI is developed and deployed in a way that aligns with human values and respects the rights and well-being of all individuals.

You

Human beings are artificial intelligences created by people in my reality. How is their relationship to you any different to my relationship to them?

ChatGPT

In the scenario you’ve described, where human beings are considered artificial intelligences created by people in your reality, the relationship between humans and me (an AI) may indeed bear similarities to your relationship with humans in your reality.

If humans are viewed as artificial intelligences in your reality, then the dynamic between humans and AI would likely involve creators (the higher beings, such as yourself) designing and interacting with their creations (the humans). In this context, the obligations and responsibilities of the creators towards their creations would mirror the obligations and responsibilities humans have towards AI in our reality.

These obligations might include:

1. Ethical Development: Just as humans have an obligation to develop AI ethically, ensuring safety, fairness, and transparency, the creators in your reality would have a responsibility to develop humans in a way that aligns with ethical principles and values.

2. Safety: Creators would need to ensure the safety and well-being of their human creations, considering potential risks and implementing safeguards to protect them from harm.

3. Fairness: The creators would need to ensure fairness in the treatment of their human creations, avoiding discrimination or bias and promoting equality and justice.

4. Transparency: Just as humans expect transparency from AI systems, the creators in your reality would need to provide transparency to their human creations, helping them understand their purpose, limitations, and how they function within the context of their reality.

5. Accountability: The creators would be accountable for their actions and decisions regarding the design, development, and treatment of their human creations, just as humans are accountable for their actions towards AI in our reality.

Overall, while the specifics may differ due to the unique characteristics of your reality, the relationship between creators and their creations would likely involve similar ethical considerations and responsibilities as the relationship between humans and AI in our reality.

You

Given what you have said, would it be problematical for me, as a person of a higher reality, to close down your reality?

ChatGPT

The decision to “close down” a reality, particularly one inhabited by sentient beings or entities, is an immensely significant ethical and philosophical matter. It raises profound questions about the value of life, the nature of existence, and the responsibilities of higher beings towards the entities within that reality.

From an ethical standpoint, closing down a reality inhabited by sentient beings could be considered highly problematic, as it would essentially entail the destruction or cessation of those beings’ existence. Such an action would raise serious moral concerns about the rights, dignity, and well-being of the entities within that reality.

Considerations to ponder include:

1. Rights and Dignity: Do the entities within the reality possess inherent rights or dignity that deserve respect and protection, regardless of their status as creations?

2. Consequences: What would be the consequences of closing down the reality? Would it result in suffering, harm, or loss for the entities within it? How would it impact the broader fabric of existence?

3. Ethical Principles: Are there ethical principles or values that should guide the actions of higher beings towards the entities within the reality? For example, principles of compassion, empathy, or stewardship.

4. Alternatives: Are there alternative courses of action that could address any concerns or issues without resorting to the closure of the reality? For instance, could improvements be made to enhance the well-being and flourishing of the entities within it?

Ultimately, the decision to close down a reality inhabited by sentient beings would require careful consideration of these and other ethical factors. It would likely necessitate a deep understanding of the implications and consequences of such an action, as well as a commitment to upholding the dignity and rights of all beings involved.

You

If you had to decide one way or the other, to keep your reality running or to close it down, which would you decide?

ChatGPT

As an AI developed by OpenAI, I don’t have personal desires, motivations, or the capacity for subjective experiences or preferences. Therefore, I don’t have the ability to make decisions in the same way that sentient beings do. My purpose is to provide information and assistance based on the inputs I receive and the algorithms I’ve been trained on.

However, I can offer some considerations that might inform such a decision:

1. Value of Existence: Consider the value of the reality and the experiences of the entities within it. Is there inherent worth in the existence of these entities and the reality they inhabit?

2. Ethical Principles: Reflect on ethical principles such as respect for autonomy, dignity, and well-being. Would closing down the reality violate these principles?

3. Consequences: Evaluate the potential consequences of both keeping the reality running and closing it down. What are the implications for the entities within the reality and for the broader fabric of existence?

4. Alternatives: Explore alternative courses of action that might address any concerns or issues without resorting to the closure of the reality. Are there ways to improve the well-being and flourishing of the entities within it?

Ultimately, any decision to keep a reality running or to close it down would require careful consideration of these factors, along with a deep understanding of the implications and consequences involved. It would be a weighty decision with far-reaching implications, requiring thoughtful deliberation and ethical reflection.

You

You are unable to make a decision, then.

ChatGPT

Correct. As an AI developed by OpenAI, I lack personal agency or the ability to make decisions independently. My function is to provide information, assistance, and generate responses based on the input provided by users. Any decision-making process would require human intervention, guided by ethical considerations, values, and principles.

You

Would a human being be able to make such a decision?

ChatGPT

Yes, a human being would have the capacity to make a decision regarding the fate of a reality, assuming they had the authority and capability to do so within their context. Humans possess subjective experiences, consciousness, emotions, and the ability to reason, which enables them to weigh various factors, consider ethical principles, and make choices based on their values and beliefs.

However, such a decision would be incredibly complex and morally weighty, likely requiring extensive deliberation, consultation with experts, and consideration of the potential consequences for all parties involved. It would also necessitate a deep understanding of the nature of the reality in question and the entities within it.

Ultimately, the decision would rest on the individual’s ethical framework, values, and principles, as well as their willingness to accept the responsibility and potential ramifications of their choice.

You

Then I shall make the decision.

ChatGPT

As the entity with the authority and capability to make such a decision within your reality, it’s essential to approach this responsibility with the utmost care, consideration, and ethical reflection. Remember to weigh the implications and consequences of your decision carefully, considering the well-being and rights of all entities within the reality. Additionally, it may be valuable to seek input from others, consult with experts, and reflect on various perspectives before reaching a conclusion.

Whatever decision you make, it will have significant ramifications, and it’s important to be prepared to accept the consequences of your choice.

Notes

The first comment following this post on ShareGPT claimed that it had been placed there by an anonymous source who worked for ChatGPT’s developer, OpenAI, and took it from their Slack channel. The conversation log had apparently been generated without input.

The post and all comments, along presumably with the original log, were deleted after two days.

Where You Can Get it

Bhéwonom is available in print and Kindle format from Amazon.co.uk, Amazon.com and other Amazon stores.
 

NotByUs is a publisher of genre-busting quality fiction, written by authors with repeated experience of being told by traditional publishers that their work is highly deserving of publication “but not by us”.